You are currently browsing the FYI Central weblog archives for the day Friday, March 5th, 2010.

NASA closing? fuel for thought

on Mar5 2010

Okay, so our President is going to cancel NASA. What if his reasons are not only budget?

Hypothetically, let’s put ourselves in his shoes. What if he knew things that public does not know about the future of space travel?

Hypothetically of course, if the President knew the extent of our military technology, compared to public sector. Which NASA is a, for the public’s benefit agency. On the other hand, though our military is for public benefit but the best and most futuristic technology has always been kept a secret from the public.

It’s easy to imagine our Military Aerospace Research dollars have made much greater strides then NASA has.  Shuttling satellites and science projects into space while delivering parts to the International Space Station has helped us. But now maybe it is time to look for better way to get into space.

Hypothetically speaking, of course, what if our President knows that we have a technology so advanced that it would be foolish to spend any more money doing things the way we are.

In retrospect, if propeller airplanes were the only aircraft around, and our government learned of a craft called a jet plane. Do you think they would want to keep spending money building airplanes? If our military had anti gravity flying machines  that could replace billion dollar rocket technology. Would it be wise to stop wastefully spending on rockets?

Imagine if space craft really do exists and scientists have  reverse engineered them. Do you think that they would tell us? Wouldn’t you think there would be a time, when they have to tell us? Wouldn’t it be right to stop wasting money, before telling the public. They have also spent billions on another technology, that will replace rockets?

More likely governments would keep a weapon like that secret and just stop publicly delivering payloads into space. I did not say they would stop, I’m just suggesting. Why make noise and report each launch, when they can do it quietly at night?

Fact Finders, Ufologists and government Watch-dogs, report cover-ups that would explain sightings of a identifiable flying objects, speculate government involvement in unconventional aircraft technology.

Reports of revolutionary new energy technologies have  surfaced in various parts of the globe. One, an engine is said to deify gravity. Having no friction it generated energy with little or no heat / power loss.  How would you, if you were the President go about telling the general public.  Where this technology came from? How much it cost to develop it? And, why it took so long to make it public?

Just something to think about. Time will tell.

Menu

Search

FlickR

flickrRSS probably needs to be setup